Do Fieldbroadcasters produce Free Energy?

Choose your own terminology. It is simply organisational or patterned energy which, because it is organised like a sieve or web, tends to catch energy and concentrate it instead of dispersing it. In the days of the Alchemists such as Paracelsus this energy was called ether. No law requires us to adopt the equivocations, peer pressure, funding considerations and tenured positions of physics professors. By the same token, Field Broadcasters are not perpetual motion machines that never wear out.  To be sure, the warmth that drives a wind turbine or the light that powers a solar panel comes from the sun, but for practical purposes we can treat these bits of gear as free energy devices, no matter that they wear out. After all, plants do this too, though they have the added capacity of reproducing themselves for free.

Of course, living organisms concentrate not only energy; they concentrate carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and/or other substances. They manage to organize this material in extremely complex and sophisticated ways, concentrating organization to a high degree. As Nobel Prize winning physicist Erwin Schrödinger put it, “Living organisms have the remarkable ability to draw a stream of order to themselves, thus creating an exception to the second law of thermodynamics.”

Never at a loss for another rejoinder, some detractors may abandon the argument that a field broadcaster cannot work, and argue instead that it cannot work the way it is built. Or if it works it is not working the way its makers believe it works, or it is doing unintended things, etc. To drop everything and explore these detractions—which always rear their heads and, to be fair, are at least worthy of some consideration—would strain resources in a quest for further and further and more and more refined observation and measurement, while nothing much else would be accomplished. A simple volt meter will show there is a fine current flow simply due to the differentials between the top and bottom plates of the field broadcaster. Of course, more and better detection and measurement is valid and valuable. But at Quantum Agriculture we simply have prioritized rather than being sidetracked. Wherever there is interest, by all means investigate. Using a Field Broadcaster to grow more richly organized things is the most meaningful test of whether it works as intended anyway. Just be forewarned that at the level of subtlety where Field Broadcasting works the human nervous system and human thought can influence the results. If one’s intention is to prove field broadcasting does not work, that bias alone may skew the results, and under such conditions experiments may be inconclusive. This is precisely why double blind experimentation is the gold standard in medical research—to remove the human factors, insofar as possible, from influencing the results.

For the purpose of discussion we assert that Field Broadcasters DO work, and as stated above, they are designed to have both electromagnetic AND quantum non-local, entangled effects. Unlike many related organizational energy devices which work non-locally by subtle intention with minimal physical structure—e.g. radionic instruments—Field Broadcasters have a specific physical structure that influences substances in a measurable, physical way. It may be rash to say the effects are easily measured because the changes induced by patterning the environment may require fairly sophisticated test gear to accurately measure. Yet, Osborne Reynolds established in the nineteenth century with fluid dynamics that a microscopic change at a point can effect large scale changes in the medium. Using a Fourier Transform Interferometer (weighing two and a half tons and costing hundreds of thousands of dollars) probably is not necessary, but if it is available, use it.  Arguably the human organism is better equipped to detect subtle differences in such things as flavours and odours, however. A sensitive volt meter or an oscilloscope is sufficient to show that something is happening, but as with recording brain waves the question is what that ‘something’ is. More growth, richer brix levels, fatter cattle, more successful crops and greater soil fertility are all phenomena we look to as proof. It is the approach of Goethean science to use the human senses and train them to subtle discrimination as compared to analytical science’s dependence upon instrumentation and theory.